Consider throwing a ball straight into the air. Can you predict the motion of the ball after it leaves your hand? Sure, that's easy. The ball will move upward until it gets to some highest point, then it will come back down and land in your hand again. Of course, that's what happens, and you know this because you have witnessed events like this countless times.
You've been observing the physics of everyday phenomena your entire life. But suppose we explore a question about the physics of atoms, like what does the motion of an electron around the nucleus of a hydrogen atom look li
ke? Could we answer that question based on our experience with everyday physics? Definitely not.
Why?
Because the physics that governs the behavior of systems at such small scales are not applicable to our daily life. The physics of small scale atoms is known as Quantum mechanics.
Albert Einstein played a key role in launching quantum mechanics through his theory of the photoelectric effect but remained deeply bothered by its philosophical implications. And though most of us still remember him for deriving E=MC^2 and theory of relativity, his last great contribution to physics was actually a 1935 paper, coauthored with his young colleagues Boris Podolsky and Nathan Rosen.
This EPR paper has recently become central to a new understanding of quantum physics, with its description of a strange phenomenon now known as entangled states.
The very complex definition of Entangled states according to Quantum mechanics entangled systems are defined to be one whose quantum state cannot be factored as a product of states of its local constituents; that is to say, they are not individual particles but are an inseparable whole. In entanglement, one constituent cannot be fully described without considering the other(s).
This defination may not be very understandable and friendly to those oblivious to Quantum mechanics. But quantum entanglement can be illustrated by a very famous thought experiment:
Schrödinger's cat.
A physicist, who doesn't particularly like cats, puts a cat in a box,
along with a bomb that has a 50% chance of blowing up after the lid is closed.
Until we reopen the lid, there is no way of knowing whether the bomb exploded or not, and thus, no way of knowing if the cat is alive or dead.
In quantum physics, we could say that before our observation the cat was in a superposition state. It was neither alive nor dead but rather in a mixture of both possibilities, with a 50% chance for each. The same sort of thing happens to physical systems at quantum scales, like an electron orbiting in a hydrogen atom. The electron isn't really orbiting at all. It's sort of everywhere in space, all at once, with more of a probability of being at some places than others,
and it's only after we measure its position that we can pinpoint where it is at that moment( i know it defies what we were taught in school but do remember we were taught wrong). A lot like how we didn't know whether the cat was alive or dead until we opened the box. This brings us to the strange and beautiful phenomenon of quantum entanglement.
Suppose that instead of one cat in a box, we have two cats in two different boxes. If we repeat the Schrödinger's cat experiment with this pair of cats,
the outcome of the experiment can be one of four possibilities.
Either both cats will be alive,
or both will be dead,
or one will be alive and the other dead,
or vice versa.
The system of both cats is again in a superposition state, with each outcome having a 25% chance rather than 50%. But here's the cool thing:
Quantum mechanics tells us it's possible to erase the both cats alive and both cats dead outcomes from the superposition state.
In other words, there can be a two cat system,
such that the outcome will always be one cat alive and the other cat dead.
The technical term for this is that the states of the cats are entangled.
But there's something truly mind blowing about quantum entanglement.
If you prepare the system of two cats in boxes in this entangled state,
then move the boxes to opposite ends of the universe, the outcome of the experiment will still always be the same. One cat will always come out alive, and the other cat will always end up dead.
How is it that the states of cats on opposite sides of the universe
can be entangled in this way?
They're too far away to communicate with each other in time, so how do the two bombs always conspire such that one blows up and the other doesn't?
You might be thinking,
"This is just some theoretical shit. This sort of thing can't happen in the real world."
But it turns out that quantum entanglement has been confirmed in real world lab experiments.
Two subatomic particles entangled in a superposition state, where if one spins one way then the other must spin the other way, will do just that, even when there's no way for information to pass from one particle to the other indicating which way to spin to obey the rules of entanglement.
Everyday with every new discovery we find that the world we live iindeed
much more complex and outlandish than we realize it is.
Comments